Consider the following cases and give your profiling thoughts. You can use the guiding questions to structure your response or just throw your thoughts out! I will post new cases every Monday along with my profile of the previous week’s case.

June 30, 2025

2. The Stillwater Offender

Over the past 18 months, four women have been found dead across three neighboring counties in the Midwest. The victims had no known connections, and the murders occurred in different jurisdictions. But the similarities between the cases tell a much deeper story. The behavioral evidence points not to randomness, but to repetition—a pattern of control, care, and subtle ritual.


📄 Case Overview

VictimAgeLocationNotable Details
Erica Hale37Behind a dental officeFound lying on her side, facing away from the building; body washed and clothed.
Sylvia Krall42End of a neighborhood park pathHair partially brushed, face covered with lightweight scarf; item of jewelry missing.
Denise Ulmer34Near a self-storage fenceFound under a camera known to be broken; redressed in her own clothing, but shirt misbuttoned.
Kim Tran39Train station overflow lotWashed, fully clothed; one shoe missing; shirt buttoned incorrectly.

🔍 Behavioral Markers

  • All victims were washed and redressed, suggesting postmortem handling and an attempt to restore or stage a specific image.
  • Manual strangulation was the cause of death in each case.
  • There are no signs of sexual assault or robbery.
  • A single item is missing from each victim: a necklace, shoe, earring, or watch—likely kept as a trophy.
  • Bodies were placed in semi-secluded but accessible locations, likely chosen for practicality and familiarity, not symbolic meaning.

Leave a comment

1. Profiling Practice Case #1: “The Candlelight Intruder”

The Case:

In a quiet suburban neighborhood, 34-year-old Melissa Hartley was found dead in her home around 6:30 a.m. on a Tuesday morning. Her husband discovered her body in their bedroom after returning from a business trip. She had been strangled and suffered several shallow cuts on her arms and shoulders. The power had been cut to the house, and several candles had been lit throughout the home. No valuables were stolen, but a kitchen knife—presumed to be responsible for the shallow cuts—was left behind at the scene. Her body was found posed with her hands folded across her chest.

There were no signs of forced entry, but the back door was unlocked. Neighbors reported hearing nothing unusual, though one recalled seeing a man walking down the street around 2 a.m. wearing dark clothing and carrying a small backpack.

Police found a partially burned piece of notebook paper in the fireplace. Only a few words were legible: “watched… special… perfect timing.”

Guiding Questions

What crime scene behaviors seem organized? Which seem disorganized?

Do you think the victim was targeted or randomly selected? Why?

What does the posing of the body suggest about the offender’s psychological state or motivation?

What might the candles and note fragment suggest about fantasy or ritual?

Based on the details, what kind of offender profile would you begin to build (age, gender, personality, potential mental state)?

2 responses to “Profiling Challenge of the Week”

  1. Amanda Miller Avatar

    Profiling the Candlelight Intruder: Organized Fantasy or Intimate Staging?

    What do we make of this crime scene? Is this the work of a stranger, or could the husband have staged it to look that way? Let’s walk through the key behavioral elements of the case and build a profile based on the evidence available. Organized vs. Disorganized

    Many aspects of this scene point to an organized offender:

    • Power was cut, indicating planning and knowledge of the home.
    • The scene was staged with candles and posing.
    • A note was brought to the scene (and possibly meant to be destroyed).

    However, some disorganized elements stand out:

    • The knife was taken from the home, not brought by the offender.
    • The note was only partially burned, possibly forgotten or abandoned in haste.
    • Leaving the weapon behind is a major forensic risk.

    This mixture suggests someone with organized tendencies but limited real-world experience, likely acting out a long-held fantasy for the first or second time.Ritual and Fantasy

    Several details suggest that this crime was fantasized extensively:

    • Candles and body posing indicate symbolic staging, not impulse.
    • Shallow cuts seem more ritualistic than practical, perhaps representing ownership, intimacy, or an internal narrative.
    • The burned note may have held personal meaning to the offender and shows signs that the victim had been stalked prior to the incident.

    These are the hallmarks of a fantasy-driven offender: someone who has mentally rehearsed the scene and seeks control over both the victim and the narrative.Could This Be Power-Reassurance?

    Some aspects may suggest elements of the power-reassurance typology:

    • The candlelight and note feel oddly romantic or intimate.
    • The gentle body positioning may imply remorse or imagined connection.

    However, classic power-reassurance rapists usually seek affirmation and compliance, not death. They rarely kill their victims. This scene leans more toward a romanticized delusion than reassurance-seeking.

    The offender may have felt an imagined bond with the victim—possibly a parasocial obsession or unrequited fixation—but not necessarily due to low self-worth. This points more toward a fantasy-based organized offender than a pure power-reassurance type.Offender Profile (Working Sketch)

    Likely Characteristics:

    • Male, age 23–27- this offender has had time to develop his fantasies, but has not perfected his execution, indicating a less experienced organized offender
    • Likely single, possibly socially isolated- with this much of a fantasy life, he lives in his head lot, making it likely that he struggles socially and romantically
    • Lives alone or in a place where late-night movement wouldn’t draw attention
    • May work in a job with access or autonomy (delivery, tech, maintenance)- he would need time and flexibility to stalk his victims. It could also allow him access to the exterior of homes- allowing him to cut power without drawing attention
    • Fantasy life is rich and obsessive, possibly with previous voyeuristic behavior
    • May have followed or stalked the victim prior to the attack
    • Lacks criminal sophistication but has mentally rehearsed the crime
    • May express remorse or internal conflict afterward

     What We Still Need to Know:

    • Cause of death: Was it manual strangulation, ligature, or a garrote? This information gives us clues about his level of experience, his need for control, what type of fantasy he experiences, and how much strength was required to execute the crime
    • Sexual assault evidence: Penetration? Clothing removed? Semen present? This information helps us determine the motivation of the crime and the type of killer we’re working with. 
    • Victim’s clothing and state: Any signs of dressing/undressing?
    • Timeline and husband’s alibi: Any inconsistencies? Even if we find evidence that points in another direction, it’s important to rule the husband out as a suspect. When a woman is found murdered in her home the first suspect is naturally her significant other. I find it very likely that we would be able to rule the husband out quickly based on the abundance of evidence pointing to an intruder.
    • Where the knife came from: Was it part of the victim’s kitchen set? It seems pretty obvious that it was, but we need to confirm that.

    This is a case that walks the line between intimacy and delusion, between planning and inexperience. It raises critical questions about how we understand fantasy-driven offenders and reminds us that not all ritualistic killers are sadistic. Some are trying to recreate a fantasy of closeness they can never achieve in real life.

    For now, the evidence points toward a young, organized, first-time killer driven by fantasy, not a domestic abuser attempting to stage a scene. It is possible that this offender has previously committed voyeurism, burglary, and/or rape.

    Note: This scene is actually pretty unlikely in real life. This type of organized offender would have no reason to burn a journal he had been keeping regarding his exploits. It’s much more likely he would have kept that note to relive the experience later. Ritual and evidence of fantasy make it easier to profile this offender, but police don’t typically have access to blatant evidence of that and must make inferences based on location, means of death, injuries (pre or post-mortem) and other clues about offender behavior.

    Like

  2. Amanda Miller Avatar

    Profiling the Stillwater Offender: Precision, Ritual, and Control

    Over the past 18 months, four women have been found dead across three neighboring counties in the Midwest. The victims had no known connections, and the murders occurred in different jurisdictions. But the similarities between the cases tell a much deeper story. The behavioral evidence points not to randomness, but to repetition—a pattern of control, care, and subtle ritual.📄 Case Overview

    Victim

    Age

    Location

    Notable Details

    Erica Hale

    37

    Behind a dental office

    Found lying on her side, facing away from the building; body washed and clothed.

    Sylvia Krall

    42

    End of a neighborhood park path

    Hair partially brushed, face covered with lightweight scarf; item of jewelry missing.

    Denise Ulmer

    34

    Near a self-storage fence

    Found under a camera known to be broken; redressed in her own clothing, but shirt misbuttoned.

    Kim Tran

    39

    Train station overflow lot

    Washed, fully clothed; one shoe missing; shirt buttoned incorrectly.🔍 Behavioral Markers

    • All victims were washed and redressed, suggesting postmortem handling and an attempt to restore or stage a specific image.
    • Manual strangulation was the cause of death in each case.
    • There are no signs of sexual assault or robbery.
    • A single item is missing from each victim: a necklace, shoe, earring, or watch—likely kept as a trophy.
    • Bodies were placed in semi-secluded but accessible locations, likely chosen for practicality and familiarity, not symbolic meaning.

    🧠 Interpreting the Ritual

    This offender is not seeking publicity or attempting to send a coded message. The ritual appears inward-facing:

    • Washing and redressing may reflect a fantasy of control, caretaking, or emotional rewriting of the crime.
    • The missing item could serve as a token for the offender to relive the experience.
    • The misbuttoned shirts or half-completed grooming may be intentional—recreating a moment from the offender’s internal script, or demonstrating dominance over the victim’s appearance.

    The offender is experienced enough to avoid detection, careful in planning, and likely fantasizing about the victim beyond the act of killing. These details suggest that the behavior is compulsive, rehearsed, and ritualized—but not theatrical.💋 Is There a Sexual Component?

    Yes—though there is no evidence of sexual assault, the Stillwater offender’s behavior strongly suggests a paraphilic sexual motive rooted in fantasy, not physical violation. Many serial offenders express sexual gratification through control, ritual, and postmortem interaction rather than through direct contact.

    • Washing the body may serve to “purify” or prepare the victim for a fantasy role.
    • Redressing or misbuttoning clothing may be part of a fetishistic script or psychological reenactment.
    • Trophy removal (e.g., one item missing from each victim) points to private reliving of the event, which is often sexual in nature.

    Like Dennis Rader or Jerry Brudos, this offender appears to derive satisfaction from domination and internal narrative, not traditional assault. The absence of overt sexual violence does not rule out a sexually motivated homicide when fantasy and ritual are this strong.👤 Offender Profile (Working Sketch)

    Likely Characteristics:

    • Male, age 30–45
    • Highly organized and cautious; likely has a history of pre-crime surveillance
    • May live or work near dump sites and be familiar with the area layout
    • Probably single or socially isolated, with difficulty forming lasting relationships
    • Likely keeps souvenirs and relives the crimes privately
    • Comfortable with prolonged contact with the victim postmortem
    • May follow news coverage or track investigative efforts

    Like

Leave a comment